ktcute
19-12-2002, 03:46 PM
I'm curious what coaches make of the current approach propagated by our national performance director, and whether the proposed "elite" and "fitness" ends of sport are necessarily going to be in conflict.
Given that Bill Sweetenham seems to be intent on demanding a great deal of our top swimmers, is this going to destroy the intrinsic motivation of athletes to take part, and generate comments like "I don't like swimming that much."? Is it likely that we will have top athletes leaving the sport, and will this be a loss to the sport as a whole, or will we find that it will act as incentive to youngsters to come through?
Extrinsic motivators tend to be resented by people if they consider them to be "bribery and corruption", and are in themselves often detrimental to instrinsic motivation. If this is the case, what sort of bedfellows are elite and everyday sport going to make? Are everyday sporting activities supposed to look to our elite for inspiration, and if so surely seeing people being badly motivated will only lead to harm to the sport as a whole?
Given that Bill Sweetenham seems to be intent on demanding a great deal of our top swimmers, is this going to destroy the intrinsic motivation of athletes to take part, and generate comments like "I don't like swimming that much."? Is it likely that we will have top athletes leaving the sport, and will this be a loss to the sport as a whole, or will we find that it will act as incentive to youngsters to come through?
Extrinsic motivators tend to be resented by people if they consider them to be "bribery and corruption", and are in themselves often detrimental to instrinsic motivation. If this is the case, what sort of bedfellows are elite and everyday sport going to make? Are everyday sporting activities supposed to look to our elite for inspiration, and if so surely seeing people being badly motivated will only lead to harm to the sport as a whole?